And now for something completely different.
Matthew Taylor, former senior adviser to the UK Labor government, discusses the meaning of 21st Century Enlightenment and how it might help us address current challenges.
And now for something completely different.
Matthew Taylor, former senior adviser to the UK Labor government, discusses the meaning of 21st Century Enlightenment and how it might help us address current challenges.
Professor Mark Blyth on austerity measures and why they are not nearly as straightforward as some would have you believe.
I am by no means a Marxist. However, this does not mean Marx was entirely incorrect and has little use to the present debate. To the contrary, as David Harvey points out in this spectacular animation, Marx is entirely relevant. With reference to Marx’s writings, Harvey demonstrates that capital has an inherent quality that causes it to be concentrated in the hands of fewer individuals who jeopardize not only the efficiency of a capitalist system, but also the system itself (my words). While Harvey does not explicitly state as much, he seems to imply the need for a paradigm shift away from our present thinking about the way in which society is organized. Regardless of your political stripe, this animated video is engaging and thought provoking. It also offers a great summary of the dialogue that has taken shape across the world in response to the global financial crisis.
by Andrew Trueblood
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (aka The Government Sponsored Entities or GSEs) represent one of the biggest short-term domestic challenges in this country. While issues ranging from debt to climate to entitlements all pose major (some may say existential) challenges to our country and our way of living, they are all so large that they will take years and generations to address. Fannie and Freddie, however, must be addressed without delay unless we want to risk our entire housing ecosystem, and perhaps (as we learned in 2007-2008) the broader market.
by Andrew Trueblood
Recently, BM sent me an interesting opinion piece about the Anglo political-economic dilemma, which happens to parallel rather closely the American one:
http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/02/riseoftheredtories/
As far as a political analysis goes, Mr. Blond lets his ideas wallow under the constraints of the conservative-liberal divide. Instead of letting the debate define the sides, he does just the opposite. As the industrialized world and the U.S. face some of their most economically existential questions, I have been disappointed by the retrenchment of failed ideologies on both sides of the aisle. Social welfarists and public sector idealists, you failed (1972).