Posts tagged “globalization”

June 21st, 2011

Niall Ferguson of Harvard University argues against former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers’ point that the United States needs more stimulus. I clearly don’t agree with Ferguson on the need to enact immediate deficit reduction, nor his beliefs about what caused the Great Depression and the lost decade in Japan.

Yet, he does make a compelling - and clearly controversial - case for Greece to default, abandon the Euro, and adopt the drachma. On this point, he is correct that Greece stands to gain little from meeting its debt obligations, but a lot from failing to do so. Today, Greek monetary policy is explicitly outsourced to the European Central Bank, while fiscal policy decisions have been implicitly outsourced to the IMF, Germany, France and other EU members that have bailed the country out. Defaulting and starting anew, says Ferguson, will give Greece the ability to take control of economic policy decision making once again.

This is all good and well, but what about the rest of us? A Greek default will most likely cause a global financial crisis that will hurt economies worldwide. Clearly, there is a misalignment of incentives between the Greek people and the rest of the world.

July 7th, 2010

How austerity will not create growth in the United States

Alberto Alesina, a Harvard economics professor, has been making the case that spending cuts and tax increases generate economic growth.  In a paper presented to the European Union’s economic and finance ministers in April of this year, Alesina made the argument that large spending cuts, sufficient to reduce budget deficits, have often been followed by economic growth.  He writes:

Current increases in taxes and/or spending cuts perceived as permanent, by removing the danger of sharper and more costly fiscal adjustments in the future, generate a positive wealth effect.

Read More

June 13th, 2010

The Chinese Labor Market: Less Cheap and Less Abundant

by Jordan Eizenga

The Chinese labor market is primarily known forbeing both cheap and abundant.  The supposed reserve of potential laborers helps explain why labor is so cheap in China; someone is always willing to work at a given wage, just so long as that wage is higher than what he or she would earn from the subsistence economy of the rural interior.  The Economist traces this view back to the development economist Sir Arthur Lewis who, in 1953, commented that Asian labor was “unlimited in supply.”

Read More

Loading tweets...

@BroaderMarket